connectionist architecture
Connectionist Architectures for Multi-Speaker Phoneme Recognition
We present a number of Time-Delay Neural Network (TDNN) based architectures for multi-speaker phoneme recognition (/b,d,g/ task). We use speech of two females and four males to compare the performance of the various architectures against a baseline recognition rate of 95.9% for a single IDNN on the six-speaker /b,d,g/ task. This series of modu(cid:173) lar designs leads to a highly modular multi-network architecture capable of performing the six-speaker recognition task at the speaker dependent rate of 98.4%. In addition to its high recognition rate, the so-called "Meta-Pi" architecture learns - without direct supervision - ognize the speech of one particular male speaker using internal models of other male speakers exclusively.
A competitive modular connectionist architecture
We describe a multi-network, or modular, connectionist architecture that captures that fact that many tasks have structure at a level of granularity intermediate to that assumed by local and global function approximation schemes. The main innovation of the architecture is that it combines associative and competitive learning in order to learn task decompositions. A task decomposition is discovered by forcing the networks comprising the architecture to compete to learn the training patterns. As a result of the competition, different networks learn different training patterns and, thus, learn to partition the input space. The performance of the architecture on a "what" and "where" vision task and on a multi-payload robotics task are presented.
869
Connectionism challenges a basic assumption of much of AI, that mental processes are best viewed as algorithmic symbol manipulations. Connectionism replaces symbol structures with distributed representations in the form of weights between units. For problems close to the architecture of the underlying machines, connectionist and symbolic approaches can make different representational commitments for a task and, thus, can constitute different theories. For complex problems, however, the power of a system comes more from the content of the representations than the medium in which the representations reside. The connectionist hope of using learning to obviate explicit specification of this content is undermined by the problem of programming appropriate initial connectionist architectures so that they can in fact learn.
A competitive modular connectionist architecture
Jacobs, Robert A., Jordan, Michael I.
We describe a multi-network, or modular, connectionist architecture that captures that fact that many tasks have structure at a level of granularity intermediate to that assumed by local and global function approximation schemes. The main innovation of the architecture is that it combines associative and competitive learning in order to learn task decompositions. A task decomposition is discovered by forcing the networks comprising the architecture to compete to learn the training patterns. As a result of the competition, different networks learn different training patterns and, thus, learn to partition the input space. The performance of the architecture on a "what" and "where" vision task and on a multi-payload robotics task are presented.
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.18)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.06)
- North America > United States > New York (0.05)
- North America > United States > California > San Mateo County > San Mateo (0.05)
A competitive modular connectionist architecture
Jacobs, Robert A., Jordan, Michael I.
We describe a multi-network, or modular, connectionist architecture that captures that fact that many tasks have structure at a level of granularity intermediate to that assumed by local and global function approximation schemes. The main innovation of the architecture is that it combines associative and competitive learning in order to learn task decompositions. A task decomposition is discovered by forcing the networks comprising the architecture to compete to learn the training patterns. As a result of the competition, different networks learn different training patterns and, thus, learn to partition the input space. The performance of the architecture on a "what" and "where" vision task and on a multi-payload robotics task are presented.
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.18)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.06)
- North America > United States > New York (0.05)
- North America > United States > California > San Mateo County > San Mateo (0.05)
A competitive modular connectionist architecture
Jacobs, Robert A., Jordan, Michael I.
We describe a multi-network, or modular, connectionist architecture that captures that fact that many tasks have structure at a level of granularity intermediate to that assumed by local and global function approximation schemes. The main innovation of the architecture is that it combines associative and competitive learning in order to learn task decompositions. A task decomposition is discovered by forcing the networks comprising the architecture to compete to learn the training patterns. As a result of the competition, different networks learn different training patterns and, thus, learn to partition the input space. The performance of the architecture on a "what" and "where" vision task and on a multi-payload robotics task are presented.
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.18)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts (0.16)
Connectionist Architectures for Multi-Speaker Phoneme Recognition
II, John B. Hampshire, Waibel, Alex
We present a number of Time-Delay Neural Network (TDNN) based architectures for multi-speaker phoneme recognition (/b,d,g/ task). We use speech of two females and four males to compare the performance of the various architectures against a baseline recognition rate of 95.9% for a single IDNN on the six-speaker /b,d,g/ task. This series of modular designs leads to a highly modular multi-network architecture capable of performing the six-speaker recognition task at the speaker dependent rate of 98.4%. In addition to its high recognition rate, the so-called "Meta-Pi" architecture learns - without direct supervision - to recognize the speech of one particular male speaker using internal models of other male speakers exclusively.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
Connectionist Architectures for Multi-Speaker Phoneme Recognition
II, John B. Hampshire, Waibel, Alex
We present a number of Time-Delay Neural Network (TDNN) based architectures for multi-speaker phoneme recognition (/b,d,g/ task). We use speech of two females and four males to compare the performance of the various architectures against a baseline recognition rate of 95.9% for a single IDNN on the six-speaker /b,d,g/ task. This series of modular designs leads to a highly modular multi-network architecture capable of performing the six-speaker recognition task at the speaker dependent rate of 98.4%. In addition to its high recognition rate, the so-called "Meta-Pi" architecture learns - without direct supervision - to recognize the speech of one particular male speaker using internal models of other male speakers exclusively.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
Connectionist Architectures for Multi-Speaker Phoneme Recognition
II, John B. Hampshire, Waibel, Alex
We present a number of Time-Delay Neural Network (TDNN) based architectures for multi-speaker phoneme recognition (/b,d,g/ task). We use speech of two females and four males to compare the performance of the various architectures against a baseline recognition rate of 95.9% for a single IDNN on the six-speaker /b,d,g/ task.
- North America > United States > New York (0.05)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Urbana (0.05)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Champaign (0.04)